Thursday, July 13, 2006

Constituent Comment - Opponent

We don't understand why we were not given an individual vote to be excluded such Fort. We as parcel owners gain nothing from this district and certainly have a problem with the $100 special charge. You are doing nothing more than our State Rep could be doing & without the $100 charge! The City "chose" not to be included?...well, we should get to "choose" not be included also!
Doug & Teri
Their previous post

You were indeed given an "individual vote" to be excluded from the lake district. The public hearing was held in 1999 by the Rock County Board of Supervisors. You also have the right to demand removal from the district boundaries under --

33.33(3)
(3) Detachment.
Territory may be detached from the district following petition of the owner or motion of the commissioners. Proposals for detachment shall be considered by the commissioners, and territory may be detached upon a finding that such territory is not benefited by continued inclusion in the district. Appeals of the commissioners' decision may be taken under s. 33.26 (7).